[FFmpeg-cvslog] r17960 - trunk/libavcodec/xvmc.h
The Wanderer
inverseparadox
Sun Mar 15 14:17:22 CET 2009
M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> writes:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:32:10PM +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>
>>> diego <subversion at mplayerhq.hu> writes:
>>>> + All blocks before this one have already been claimed by placing their
>>>> + position into the corresponding block description structure field,
>>>> + that are part of the mv_blocks array.
>>>
>>> FWIW, I can't make heads or tails of that sentence.
>>
>> Are you referring to Ivan's or my version? Do you think the new
>> version is an improvement?
>
> Yours is better, but it still doesn't make sense. I can't suggest an
> improvement because I don't understand what it's trying to say.
I'm not positive I understand it either, but from a first glance, would
"which is part of" be better?
Though that still leaves the question of either how it is possible for
multiple blocks to have a single position, or how it is possible for
multiple positions to be stored in a single field...
--
The Wanderer is now caught up on -cvslog, but not on -user or
-devel...
Warning: Simply because I argue an issue does not mean I agree with any
side of it.
Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.
More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog
mailing list