[FFmpeg-cvslog] r17383 - trunk/libavcodec/xvmc.h
Diego Biurrun
diego
Tue Feb 17 23:35:25 CET 2009
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 07:16:26PM +0100, iive wrote:
>
> Log:
> Improvements in xvmc structure fields descriptions.
>
> --- trunk/libavcodec/xvmc.h Mon Feb 16 17:33:00 2009 (r17382)
> +++ trunk/libavcodec/xvmc.h Mon Feb 16 19:16:23 2009 (r17383)
> @@ -89,12 +86,12 @@ struct xvmc_pix_fmt {
> int unsigned_intra;
>
> /** Pointer to the surface allocated by XvMCCreateSurface().
> + It have to be freed by XvMCDestroySurface() on application exit.
"It has"
I think this is your most common grammar error and it should be
comparatively simple to get rid of. It's low-hanging if you want to
improve your English...
> @@ -134,19 +130,23 @@ struct xvmc_pix_fmt {
>
> - /** Offset to the next free data block. The mv_blocks field holds a number
> - pointing to the data blocks.
> - - application - zeroes it on get_buffer() and after successful
> - ff_draw_horiz_band().
> - - libavcodec - each macroblock increases it with the number
> + /** Number of the the next free data block.
> + One data block is 64 short values in data_blocks array.
> + All blocks before this one are already claimed by filling their number
> + in the corresponding blocks description structure field,
> + that are hold in mv_blocks array.
The last sentence is very confusing. The following improves its grammar
but my tired mind still cannot wrap itself around it:
All blocks before this one are already claimed by filling their number
into the corresponding blocks description structure field,
that are held in the mv_blocks array.
Ivan, could you try to explain this in another handful of words?
Diego
More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog
mailing list