[FFmpeg-cvslog] r11597 - trunk/doc/optimization.txt

Mike Melanson mike
Tue Jan 22 19:51:49 CET 2008

Uoti Urpala wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 19:21 +0100, melanson wrote:
>> -Normaly with clean&simple optimizations and widely used codecs a overall
>> -speedup of the affected codec of 0.1% is enough. These speedups accumulate
>> +Normally, clean & simple optimizations on widely used codecs can achieve
>> +an overall speedup of 0.1%. These speedups accumulate and can make a big
> The new version sounds as if 0.1% speedup was the typical result you
> should expect from an optimization attempt. I don't think it's meant to
> say that...

I thought that sounded odd too. We'll need Michael's input and I'll
happily do the editing to clarify. It was probably meant to read more
along the lines of "Normally, clean and simple optimizations for widely
used codecs are justified even if they only achieve an overall speedup
of 0.1%."

Mostly, I just needed an excuse to run another build/test cycle to fix a
bug in the infrastructure. :)

	-Mike Melanson

More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog mailing list