[FFmpeg-cvslog] r14484 - in trunk/libavcodec: audioconvert.c audioconvert.h

Diego Biurrun diego
Sun Aug 3 19:21:15 CEST 2008


On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 07:14:48AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> Diego Biurrun wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 06:45:21PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > 
> >> On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 06:20:03PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> 
> >>> So far we have Mans, Baptiste and Diego in favor, with only you
> >>> against..
> >> 
> >> ehh?
> >> 
> >> mans clearly said he considers common.h and internal.h as
> >> exceptions baptiste said he still has to think about if the
> >> #include of avcodec.h in audioconvert.c should be there or if
> >> audioconvert.h is sufficient And the wanderer clearly said he is
> >> against the include every header in every c and h file directly and
> >> redundantly.
> > 
> > So the Wanderer suddenly turned into an FFmpeg developer?
> 
> For the record, I never claimed to be one. I don't have any authority
> here, and I don't really expect to.
> 
> I do, however, have a mind, and an interest in the issue, and therefore
> not unsurprisingly a desire to see it addressed.

Fair enough.  However, you do have a tendency to show up in discussions
that have high flame and/or bikeshed potential.  It is difficult enough
to resolve such issues (and reach consensus) with few people involved.
The more people take part, the harder it gets.  If the people taking
part in the discussion are not directly concerned with the issues
at hand does not make things any easier.

> What you apparently interpret as "arguing for the sake of it" is, at
> least in this case, a manifestation of the way I approach figuring out
> (or otherwise trying to arrive at) answers on complicated issues, of
> which this almost unquestionably is one.

You have said it yourself:

  Warning: Simply because I argue an issue does not mean I agree with
  any side of it.

And I have seen you argue in such a fashion many times.  You will have
to forgive me if I sometimes cannot tell real concern, curiosity and
arguing for the sake of arguing apart.

Your contributions about English style and grammar are very much
appreciated, as are any possible future contributions.  Nonetheless,
when you start playing an active role in flamewars, I feel you are
stepping out of your territory.

I know it is difficult to say this without being insulting, but this is
my opinion and I know it is shared by at least Mans and Baptiste.

best regards

Diego




More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog mailing list