[FFmpeg-cvslog] [ffmpeg.org]: r68 - trunk/src/legal

michael subversion
Sun May 20 15:14:59 CEST 2007


Author: michael
Date: Sun May 20 15:14:58 2007
New Revision: 68

Log:
typos


Modified:
   trunk/src/legal

Modified: trunk/src/legal
==============================================================================
--- trunk/src/legal	(original)
+++ trunk/src/legal	Sun May 20 15:14:58 2007
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
 <BR>
 A: We do not know, we are not lawyers so we are not qualified to awnser
 this. Also we have never read patents to implement any part of ffmpeg,
-ao even if we where qualified we couldnt awnser it as we do not know
+so even if we where qualified we couldnt awnser it as we do not know
 what is patented. Furthermore the sheer number of software patents makes it
 impossible to read them all so noone (lawyer or not) could awnser
 such a question with a definite no, thouse who do lie.
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
 A: No, the legal validity of these patents is highly questionable, still in
 the current jurisdical systems it is very easy to ruin a company with patents
 even if the patents are invalid. Paying the (small) license fee is much cheaper
-than a patent lawsuit during which you would not be able to sell you product
+than a patent lawsuit during which you would not be able to sell your product
 as the patent would be valid until you win the lawsuit 5+ years in the future.
 That is assuming you didnt go bankrupt before...
 




More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog mailing list