[FFmpeg-cvslog] [ffmpeg.org]: r68 - trunk/src/legal
michael
subversion
Sun May 20 15:14:59 CEST 2007
Author: michael
Date: Sun May 20 15:14:58 2007
New Revision: 68
Log:
typos
Modified:
trunk/src/legal
Modified: trunk/src/legal
==============================================================================
--- trunk/src/legal (original)
+++ trunk/src/legal Sun May 20 15:14:58 2007
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
<BR>
A: We do not know, we are not lawyers so we are not qualified to awnser
this. Also we have never read patents to implement any part of ffmpeg,
-ao even if we where qualified we couldnt awnser it as we do not know
+so even if we where qualified we couldnt awnser it as we do not know
what is patented. Furthermore the sheer number of software patents makes it
impossible to read them all so noone (lawyer or not) could awnser
such a question with a definite no, thouse who do lie.
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
A: No, the legal validity of these patents is highly questionable, still in
the current jurisdical systems it is very easy to ruin a company with patents
even if the patents are invalid. Paying the (small) license fee is much cheaper
-than a patent lawsuit during which you would not be able to sell you product
+than a patent lawsuit during which you would not be able to sell your product
as the patent would be valid until you win the lawsuit 5+ years in the future.
That is assuming you didnt go bankrupt before...
More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog
mailing list