[DVDnav-discuss] [PATCH][libdvdread] remove needless _LIBC checks from libdvdread
Mike Frysinger
vapier at gentoo.org
Tue Dec 31 06:51:13 CET 2013
On Friday 22 February 2013 16:57:49 Erik Auerswald wrote:
> On 02/18/2013 05:55 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 09 February 2013 16:18:50 Erik Auerswald wrote:
> >> the first attached patch removes preprocessor checks for _LIBC, because
> >> libdvdread is not GNU Libc and does never #define _LIBC.
> >
> > the files you're modifying are copied from elsewhere.
>
> Copied once, there is nobody trying to keep them up to date. They should
> have been cleaned up back then, of course.
>
> To clarify: it is _not_ the question if upstream changed anything in
> these files since they were copied. The issue is that taking a random
> code snapshot and keeping it that way without thought is the very
> definition of bitrot.
is the code not working ? failing to build ? something else ? if the code
is still working, then no, it is not rotting at all.
if you did hit a bug, then simply grab a newer version from upstream.
> > hacking away at it gains literally nothing.
>
> I disagree.
>
> > what exactly is the point ? for getopt.c, it's not like
> > you really improved it -- the file is still full of portability hacks
> > from all over.
>
> Every simplification is an improvement.
not really. the point of this code is to not be read directly. it's a
generated blob maintained elsewhere.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/dvdnav-discuss/attachments/20131231/00a7e2af/attachment.asc>
More information about the DVDnav-discuss
mailing list