[DVDnav-discuss] svn or git?

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Tuesday, 19 April 2011 at 05:33, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On 18 Apr 2011, at 23:42, Nico Sabbi <nicola.sabbi at poste.it> wrote:
> > Reimar Döffinger ha scritto:
> >> 
> >> Well, for git any config is still missing as well (including
> >> commit hooks), and DNS still hasn't switched either.
> >> With the backup files it should be faster to get it running
> >> initially (without them it would of course the same effert
> >> and might make more sense to go with git directly).
> >> Also speaking from MPlayer side which currently uses svn externals
> >> for dvdnav I would prefer it if we didn't do all in one step
> >> but gave it some extra time.
> >> But do what you feel is best.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>
> >
> > well yes, I gave for granted that we should take the decision
> > without haste.
> > From what you wrote I assume that the main repository of mplayer
> > will stay in svn, right?
> 
> No, I am not at all opposed to switching. Of course other developers
> get a say, but dvdnav/dvdread (and that I have never tried git
> submodules) are actually the main reason to stick with SVN now.

FWIW, I'm fine with either option, but I still slightly prefer SVN.
OTOH, I could finally learn git properly. :)

Regards,
Dominik

-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"