[DVDnav-discuss] current revision strangeness

Nico Sabbi nicola.sabbi at poste.it
Wed Aug 20 20:00:00 CEST 2008


Il giorno mar, 19/08/2008 alle 21.48 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann'
Mierzejewski ha scritto:
> On Saturday, 26 July 2008 at 14:55, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > On Thursday, 15 May 2008 at 12:01, Nico Sabbi wrote:
> [...]
> > > I guess it has something to do with the dvdread headers in mplayer's
> > > tree that are still defined badly and included instead of the right
> > > ones. I'll have to fix this problem renaming dvdread in libdvdread
> > > (in mplayer)
> > 
> > Thinking back about this, you should've done the reverse, i.e.
> > rename libdvdread copy in MPlayer source tree instead of our new
> > upstream fork. Since there have been no releases in-between, we
> > can still go back. What do you think, Nico?
> 
> *ping*
> Anyone else feel free to weigh in, too...
> 
> Rationale is: we're the current upstream and we shouldn't break API
> just because MPlayer's internal copy clashes with upstream. It's MPlayer's
> copy that should be fixed, not the other way around. This renaming
> has already caused additional work for other people.
> 
> If there are no objections, I intend to revert the renaming in two weeks.
> 
> Regards,
> R.
> 

sorry, I missed or forgotten your post. Do you want to rename
libdvdread as dvdread? why? dvdread is a LIBrary, I don't see
why it shouldn't be called libdvdread. It's also another way
to distinguish it from the old code.
Or did I misunderstand what you mean?




More information about the DVDnav-discuss mailing list