[DVDnav-discuss] libdvdnav vs. libdvdnav2

[Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò]

On Sat, 05 May 2007 13:22:26 +0200
Nico Sabbi <nicola_sabbi at fastwebnet.it> wrote:

> - 0xff00000000000000
> + 0xff00000000000000LL seems nonsense to me: in C integer numbers are 
> automatically enclosed in the smallest enclosing type, that for a 
> 64bit value like that can only be a 64 bit value (in both 32 and 64 
> bit architectures).

I think there are a few cases where 64-bit constants are not treated
correctly, or causes a compiler's warning. I've sent a patch to Linux
kernel some time ago to fix a similar issue in the smbfs driver.

-- 
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/dvdnav-discuss/attachments/20070505/2b34e3e6/attachment.pgp>